Banned. Ignored.
So we built this.

Years banned. No reason given. One template reply. The real routes existed - scattered where nobody looks.

Intake first. Payment after. Not taken on = refunded.

So they’re all in one free guide now: the platform’s own appeal, the Match Group escalation team, the EU’s certified dispute bodies, the access request they have to answer (though they can hold back other people’s reports and how their detection works), and the money you’re owed. We had a Tinder ban lifted 31 days after our access request. Every step is in the case study.

One thing stated plainly, because most of this industry implies the opposite: the in-app appeal runs on your own login, so it is always yours to send. Tinder’s Appeals Center, Hinge’s in-app button and Grindr’s wizard all run on your own login, and all three forbid account sharing (Tinder and Hinge in the same words, Grindr in its own), so handing over a password would turn a possibly mistaken ban into a thoroughly deserved one. So: we build every route, the appeal inside the app is yours to send on your own login, and everything outside it goes in your name, online, or by signed post on The Advocate, and we copy you on each one. We never ask for your password, the code the app texts you, or your Apple or Google sign-in.

Where the cases get built. No ticket queue: every file is handled end to end by the case team.